THE PUBLISHED CLAIM
Forer’s subjects rated the sketch 4.30 out of 5, in a 1948 study.
OR-C-2026-013 · CORRECTION
THE PUBLISHED CLAIM
Forer’s subjects rated the sketch 4.30 out of 5, in a 1948 study.
THE CORRECTED BOUNDARY
The published figure is 4.26; 1948 appears nowhere in the paper; and 4.30 is a different statistic entirely.
THE CORRECTION · WHY THE CLAIM MOVED
The original error was 4.30. The submitted fix—4.26, published 1949—was right about the number and the year. Verification found the deeper problem: 4.30 is the DIB-effectiveness mean, not the sketch mean, and it is widely mis-attached.
The scale is 0–5, anchored poor to perfect; the source was a newsstand astrology book; and Meehl coined “Barnum effect,” not Forer.
THE RECORD STATE
The claim and correction are published at tab and entry depth. Dependent copy is governed by this boundary wherever the claim appears.
Affected locationsThe Walk · web
Date precisionMonth-level date preserved from the supplied register; no day has been invented.
As-run reportThe source-linked report has not yet been transferred from the working record. No report has been invented to close the seam.
SOURCES · NAMED AND LOCATABLE
An entry is not permitted to make a missing report look complete. Published source trails remain linked; pending transfers remain visibly pending.
TRANSFER STATUS
The correction is public. Its source-linked as-run report is not yet published in this Record. The wording above is transferred from the supplied standing register; it is not a substitute for the report.
SUPERSESSION
This entry records a correction that required deeper correction. The first proposed fix remains named in the entry rather than disappearing behind the repaired conclusion.
← Return to the standing recordThe Monthly Transmission
Receive the Monthly Transmission
Codex excerpts, formation practices, audio, and invitations — once a month, no more.
Occasional transmissions only. Unsubscribe at any time.